On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 6:38 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 07:56:15AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > It was talked about December 2021, and pushed off to the new year. > > https://pagure.io/epel/issue/135 > > It's the new year, and you are the first this year to ask for it. So, time > > to get it back in the discussions. > > Could you please put what modules you want to build in that ticket, so we > > can help prioritize it. > > Personally, I'd be happy just not doing modules at all for epel9 given > the limitations we have (cannot build any module that requires rhel > modules). I'd prefer we have folks just use compatiblity packages > instead. > What's stopping us from being able to depend on RHEL modules? Koji now supports enabling module streams on a per tag basis, so it *should* be possible now. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
