On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 11:42:34AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 4:20 AM Michel Alexandre Salim > <salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:35:59PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > It does seem to be used by robosignatory (the thing that signs Fedora > > > packages, I think): > > > > Sorry for the late reply! Meant to ask you about this, as I tried and > > find what requires trousers before my first post and didn't see > > robosignatory at all. > > I asked Patrick about this last week, it's an old dependency that was > never cleaned up. On a previous generation of HW they used to use a > TPM1 to store bits used by robosignatory but it was never a direct > dependency. That's no longer the case so it can be cleaned up. Ah, that's good to know! I still intend to maintain trousers for at least the next couple of years - but the less dependent packages, the better. Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
