On 15. 01. 22 18:41, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I was also confused about two things here: - It's retired on the "main" branch, but the c9s branch seems intact.
Indeed, that is how this was done for many (all?) retired c9s packages. I believe this is confusing.
- What does "retired for CS-569" mean?
"CS-569" is a reference for an internal ticket. I believe this is not transparent. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
