Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/14/22 05:36, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:27 AM Leon Fauster via epel-devel
<epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Am 14.01.22 um 13:02 schrieb Josh Boyer:
A fairly accurate list of packages removed in RHEL 9 can be found in
our RHEL 9 Adoption documentation:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9-beta/html-single/considerations_in_adopting_rhel_9/index#removed-packages_assembly_changes-to-packages


It seems that RH does not see RHEL as workstation OS anymore.
Many tools were/will be removed. I do not need to be bright to
anticipate that in the future (e.g. RHEL11) the trouble will
prevails the benefit. EPEL QA is better then ever but it will
not fill the gap. Thats like swimming agains the stream. Unless
RH incorporates EPEL into his strategies. Like keeping the volume
of packages officially and just shifting the borders ... thought.


I think that's an unfair characterization. While it's certainly true
that RHEL focuses on server workloads (it's easily an order of
magnitude more sales than workstation ones), it's also true that Red
Hat is *finally* investing in EPEL. This is the *first* RHEL release
where Red Hat is *directly* investing in helping the community bring
up EPEL. The RHEL folks are giving us a path to request packages as
needed from being buildroot-only (thus internal to non-public RHEL
Koji) to published repositories (thus usable by EPEL and
third-parties).

I *personally* have done this now many times with great success, and
the consequence of that is we're able to get content into EPEL faster
than ever before. We're even going to be ready for the RHEL 9.0 GA,
which is something we've never had before.

I seem to have missed how to do this, could you point me to the right process?

Thanks!

--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems          720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       orion@xxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301                 https://www.nwra.com/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux