On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:04 AM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:00:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > If Fedora and EPEL were to have older versions, we'd have to have a > > dedicated CDN endpoint for them, because mirrors would seriously have > > trouble taking it. > > How often would such packages be used? If we had a non-default repo > available but not enabled by default, it could be optional to mirror and > probably still be okay. > I suspect it would be fairly heavily used. There are significant benefits to having those: * DeltaRPM would be considerably more useful * "dnf history undo" would actually work We could make it non-default and tell people that rollbacks require an --enablerepo= option, though. Having its own mirror module would also give mirrors the ability to opt in, and I wouldn't be surprised if a good chunk of them do. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
