On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 19:40 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 7:38 PM Michel Alexandre Salim > <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007031 -- openssl > > 3.x > > won't be added to RHEL 8, while updated packages are starting to > > need > > it. > > > > It thus seems to be a good candidate for EPEL; the question is - > > are we > > allowed to maintain openssl3-* packages from the openssl srpm repo, > > or > > do we need to explicitly have an epel8-only (possibly F35 and F34 > > too, > > as they also don't have openssl3) 'openssl3' srpm repo? > > > > You'll need an openssl3 SRPM repo, but you could have commits synced > from openssl from CentOS Stream 9. > Ah, thanks. Is there a written policy disallowing renaming the package in the spec like I did? (I sense it might not be fully legitimate, but couldn't find anything). Between syncing with Rawhide/Fedora and syncing with CS9, this will be interesting. CS9 *does* have openssl 3.x and we generally don't want to change this package too much, so if merging from a different package is needed for maintenance anyway, maybe CS9 is the better 'upstream' to use. Will check at the EPEL meeting today before proceeding, thanks! -- Michel Alexandre Salim profile: https://keyoxide.org/michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
