On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 7:38 PM Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007031 -- openssl 3.x > won't be added to RHEL 8, while updated packages are starting to need > it. > > It thus seems to be a good candidate for EPEL; the question is - are we > allowed to maintain openssl3-* packages from the openssl srpm repo, or > do we need to explicitly have an epel8-only (possibly F35 and F34 too, > as they also don't have openssl3) 'openssl3' srpm repo? > You'll need an openssl3 SRPM repo, but you could have commits synced from openssl from CentOS Stream 9. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
