Re: EPEL package and Java 11 requirement.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 10:41 AM Stefan Bluhm
<fedoraproject.org@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> When opening a Buzilla, these common issues popped up:
>
> java-11-openjdk-headless RPM does not provide java-headless capability
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797054
> - "Hi. This is intentional. It will be added once jdk8 will stop to be the system JDK."
>
> javapackages-tools: wrong generated Requires: `java-headless >= 11`
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993879
> - "The culprint *may* be xmvn, as there is (at least) one pkg in rhel8 which is jdk11 based but is build by Makefile, and do not suffer the issue."
> - "A proper long-term fix would mean redesigning how provides and auto-requires are supposed to work. There are several possibilities."
> - "Another possibility is removing auto-requires on java-headless altogether - they add little value and cause much trouble."
>
> Is it possible to disable the auto-require generation in xmvn?
> Otherwise it seems I have to skip usage of xmvn just for that.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Stefan
>
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "fedoraproject org" <fedoraproject.org@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> An: "epel-devel" <epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 09:05:13
> Betreff: [EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL package and Java 11 requirement.
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> I thought (!) I read somewhere that this difference between java-headless and java-11-headless was intentional (or at least I understood it that way).
> Let me open a Bugzilla against Java 11.
>
>
>
> How did others tackle this issue in the past/currently though? I can't be the first one creating an rpm with an autogenerated java-headless >= 1:9 tag.
>
> Is there a way to disable/remove this autogeneration or force it to be something different?
> Also I noticed some packages where the headless tag was not generated at all. So maybe I could just remove the trigger for that.

It is possible to filter generated requires.
This was described in a comment in one of the bugs you referred to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993879#c10

--
Mikolaj Izdebski

>
> I tried removing maven-compiler-plugin from the pom and adding the compiler.target=11 line in the build section but that gave the same result.
>
> Thanks and best wishes,
>
> Stefan
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Mike Rochefort" <mroche@xxxxxxxxxx>
> An: "epel-devel" <epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Gesendet: Montag, 4. Oktober 2021 22:57:09
> Betreff: [EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL package and Java 11 requirement.
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:50 PM Stefan Bluhm
> <fedoraproject.org@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > it provides "java-11-headless". Not "java-headless". At least not on my machine
>
> Doing my own checks on CentOS Stream 8 and RHEL 8.4, this sounds like a Fedora
> change that didn't make its way back to RHEL. Worth opening a Bugzilla
> report on?
>
> For posterity, only java-1.8.0 returns when checking for java-headless
> on EL8 (latest
> versions on RHEL for 1.8 and 11 as of writing).
>
> $ rpm -qp --provides
> java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4.x86_64.rpm
> /usr/bin/jjs
> config(java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless) = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> java-1.8.0-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless(x86-64) = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> java-headless = 1:1.8.0
> java-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> jre-1.8.0-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> jre-1.8.0-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> jre-headless = 1:1.8.0
> jre-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
> libjava.so()(64bit)
> libjava.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit)
> libjsig.so()(64bit)
> libjvm.so()(64bit)
> libjvm.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit)
> libverify.so()(64bit)
> libverify.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit)
>
> $ rpm -qp --provides java-11-openjdk-headless-11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4.x86_64.rpm
> config(java-11-openjdk-headless) = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
> java-11-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
> java-11-openjdk-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
> java-11-openjdk-headless(x86-64) = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
> jre-11-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
> jre-11-openjdk-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
>
> --
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux