When opening a Buzilla, these common issues popped up: java-11-openjdk-headless RPM does not provide java-headless capability - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797054 - "Hi. This is intentional. It will be added once jdk8 will stop to be the system JDK." javapackages-tools: wrong generated Requires: `java-headless >= 11` - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993879 - "The culprint *may* be xmvn, as there is (at least) one pkg in rhel8 which is jdk11 based but is build by Makefile, and do not suffer the issue." - "A proper long-term fix would mean redesigning how provides and auto-requires are supposed to work. There are several possibilities." - "Another possibility is removing auto-requires on java-headless altogether - they add little value and cause much trouble." Is it possible to disable the auto-require generation in xmvn? Otherwise it seems I have to skip usage of xmvn just for that. Best wishes, Stefan ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- Von: "fedoraproject org" <fedoraproject.org@xxxxxxxxxxxx> An: "epel-devel" <epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 09:05:13 Betreff: [EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL package and Java 11 requirement. Hello Mike, I thought (!) I read somewhere that this difference between java-headless and java-11-headless was intentional (or at least I understood it that way). Let me open a Bugzilla against Java 11. How did others tackle this issue in the past/currently though? I can't be the first one creating an rpm with an autogenerated java-headless >= 1:9 tag. Is there a way to disable/remove this autogeneration or force it to be something different? Also I noticed some packages where the headless tag was not generated at all. So maybe I could just remove the trigger for that. I tried removing maven-compiler-plugin from the pom and adding the compiler.target=11 line in the build section but that gave the same result. Thanks and best wishes, Stefan ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- Von: "Mike Rochefort" <mroche@xxxxxxxxxx> An: "epel-devel" <epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Gesendet: Montag, 4. Oktober 2021 22:57:09 Betreff: [EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL package and Java 11 requirement. On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:50 PM Stefan Bluhm <fedoraproject.org@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > it provides "java-11-headless". Not "java-headless". At least not on my machine Doing my own checks on CentOS Stream 8 and RHEL 8.4, this sounds like a Fedora change that didn't make its way back to RHEL. Worth opening a Bugzilla report on? For posterity, only java-1.8.0 returns when checking for java-headless on EL8 (latest versions on RHEL for 1.8 and 11 as of writing). $ rpm -qp --provides java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4.x86_64.rpm /usr/bin/jjs config(java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless) = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4 java-1.8.0-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4 java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4 java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless(x86-64) = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4 java-headless = 1:1.8.0 java-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4 jre-1.8.0-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4 jre-1.8.0-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4 jre-headless = 1:1.8.0 jre-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4 libjava.so()(64bit) libjava.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit) libjsig.so()(64bit) libjvm.so()(64bit) libjvm.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit) libverify.so()(64bit) libverify.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit) $ rpm -qp --provides java-11-openjdk-headless-11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4.x86_64.rpm config(java-11-openjdk-headless) = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4 java-11-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4 java-11-openjdk-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4 java-11-openjdk-headless(x86-64) = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4 jre-11-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4 jre-11-openjdk-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4 -- Mike _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
