V Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 04:47:33AM -0400, Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 4:41 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 08. 07. 21 2:28, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > > Also, people who wish to opt out of this mass rebuild can add > > > 'noautobuild' file to the epel9-next branch beforehand, this however > > > does not stop from creating the epel9 branch, just the package won't > > > be included in the rebuild. > > > > I think there are 3 possible opt outs here: > > > > 1) The epel9-next packager does not intent to maintain the package in epel9, > > only in epel9-next. While we might not like this goes, as long as there is no > > policy against this approach, always creating the branch will create work for > > the packager they have not signed for. I think there should be an opt out for > > branching as well. > > > > This is not a valid use-case. Why? If you were a CentOS user who moved to CentOS Stream, then you are going to use epel9.next. You have no use of epel9. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
