On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 4:41 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 08. 07. 21 2:28, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > Also, people who wish to opt out of this mass rebuild can add > > 'noautobuild' file to the epel9-next branch beforehand, this however > > does not stop from creating the epel9 branch, just the package won't > > be included in the rebuild. > > I think there are 3 possible opt outs here: > > 1) The epel9-next packager does not intent to maintain the package in epel9, > only in epel9-next. While we might not like this goes, as long as there is no > policy against this approach, always creating the branch will create work for > the packager they have not signed for. I think there should be an opt out for > branching as well. > This is not a valid use-case. If we don't have this explicitly blocked in policy yet, we need to make this explicit. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
