On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 08:19:24AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > There is a little nuance here. In order to get the repository going, we had > to 'mass-branch' about 40 or so packages. fedpkg and some other items > require quite a few packages which all have to be done at once. Without > those you can't build anything else to put into EPEL... so I would say that > EPEL is the specific set of packages in order to get a minimal repository > working in the Fedora Build System. Everything else is just extras people > add to it. That is an excellent point. Perhaps we should try and identify those packages and see if we can just add epel-packagers sig to all of them? Do we have any record of those? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
