On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 03:15:29PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I think that could be workable, but I'll toss out another proposal: > > As soon as centos 9 stream exists, we create epel9-playground and allow > people to branch/add packages to it. Once rhel9 is GA, we setup epel9 as > usual and epel9-next and point epel9-next to build against stream and > playground to build against rhel9. > Do you know what CentOS 9 Stream will look like between its first availability and RHEL 9 GA? I worry that there will surface RHEL 9.1 changes. Then switching epel9-playground from CentOS 9 Stream to RHEL 9 could manifest incompatibilities as the build root would regress. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
