Re: EPEL9 - thoughts and timings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 03:05:16PM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> As we are getting closer to the F34 branching, which means we are
> getting closer to CentOS 9 Stream, which will eventually be turned
> into RHEL9 Beta, and then RHEL9 release.  Now seems like a good time
> to get ideas flowing about EPEL9.
> 
> I'm just throwing ideas around.  Nothing I'm saying here is even close
> to policy or a final plan.  If people have other ideas, feel free to
> say them.
> 
> epel8-next is getting closer and closer to being in place.
> To me it seems logical to create a epel9-next, pointing at the CentOS
> 9 Stream (when it comes).  It would need the same setting up as
> epel8-next, all the steps would be the same other than the name and
> where it points for it's repo.
> 
> We could also setup some type of signup board for if maintainers want
> the EPEL Packaging SIG to  automatically bring their packages over.
> 
> With epel9-next in place, and good set of EPEL9 packages in it, users
> would be able to test RHEL9 much better in it's beta phase.
> 
> Also, it would take alot of pressure off when we start getting regular
> EPEL9 setup.  If it takes a month or two, people wouldn't be as
> concerned, because they could always just grab the packages from
> epel9-next.

I think that could be workable, but I'll toss out another proposal:

As soon as centos 9 stream exists, we create epel9-playground and allow
people to branch/add packages to it. Once rhel9 is GA, we setup epel9 as
usual and epel9-next and point epel9-next to build against stream and
playground to build against rhel9. 

The advantages of that would be that epel9-playground is more rawhide
like... it would compose every night and there's no bodhi overhead. 
Of course to be confusing we could just treat epel9-stream that way
until GA too I suppose. 

In any case as soon as centos 9 stream is ready, I think it would indeed
be a great idea to start allowing epel builds against it one way or
another. :) 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux