On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 06:30:08AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > Very good question, one I asked in the meeting. > If I got the argument right, then the amount of red-tape / legal work > it would take to call it epel-stream would be much higher than we want > to pay. > Many of us didn't like the name "Stream" to begin with since it is > sooo overloaded. I'm also ... eyerolly ... about the Stream name, but it's the one we've got, and I think it makes a LOT of sense for this to be aligned. It'll be so much easer for users to actually find and understand than anything else I can think of. So.... I'm willing to tackle the red tape and legal work if that's the blocker. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
