On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 2:01 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 07:18:31AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > ...snipp.... > > I think Step 5 is a very important step (if I'm understanding it > > correctly). Because it will give us a good idea about how many people > > are utilizing playground. > > well, no, it will just make it more visible when packages in playground > change. > > For usage, thats another thing... we should look at the new dnf counting > that fedora is doing and see if we can use that with at least epel8... > but thats another seperate project I guess. Sorry, I wasn't clear. By "utilizing playground" I meant developers / maintainers. If we see that no, or very few packages are built in playground after we go manual, then, maybe it isn't worth the effort for epel9. If we see that a decent amount of packages are manually built in playground, then we will know it's worth the effort for epel9. I realize that package changes will probably come in waves. So I don't expect the steady stream we have in regular epel8. But we should have enough time to gauge how well the maintainers are using it. As for end users, ya. As much as I wish we could find out ... I like that we care enough about privacy that we can't find out. Troy _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
