Thanks Stephen and Florian for your input. It's now clear that a package that only adds the "missing pieces" won't work. Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > 1. Make a non-default module which contained all the rebuilt binaries > needed to make gcc-gnat and other tools work (some languages also need > other utilities rebuilt to work). > 2. Make an SCL which contains all these. > 3. Make a set of rpms which installed gcc<name> in all the same places > as gcc but didn't collide The module option seems like it would be easiest to use for the users, and would also avoid the risk that one program might invoke the wrong build of another program. Björn Persson
Attachment:
pgp8aIwJfJuEh.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
