On 19. 06. 20 21:48, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:20 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 19. 06. 20 16:03, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hi Miro,
I was hoping someone more python oriented would look at this, but I
guess that isn't happening.
I'll take a look at it later today.
The Python oriented people already reviewed this in Fedora, here are similar
F32/31 backports:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros/pull-request/60
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros/pull-request/61
If you want somebody from the Python team to review the code, I can ask a team
member. What we don't know is whether our additions are appropriate for EPEL.
For the three backported functions, I don't see any problem with those.
For the pycached, looks like it's fixing a bug, so also I'm good with it.
If other python people have looked at it, then that's good.
Let me bring this up in the EPEL Steering Committee Meeting, which is
in a couple hours.
I suspect that since nobody has said anything, nobody objects. Just
want to check.
Thanks.
As a side note, the pycached bugfix is already part of epel7.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
