On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:20 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 19. 06. 20 16:03, Troy Dawson wrote: > > Hi Miro, > > I was hoping someone more python oriented would look at this, but I > > guess that isn't happening. > > I'll take a look at it later today. > > The Python oriented people already reviewed this in Fedora, here are similar > F32/31 backports: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros/pull-request/60 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros/pull-request/61 > > If you want somebody from the Python team to review the code, I can ask a team > member. What we don't know is whether our additions are appropriate for EPEL. > For the three backported functions, I don't see any problem with those. For the pycached, looks like it's fixing a bug, so also I'm good with it. If other python people have looked at it, then that's good. Let me bring this up in the EPEL Steering Committee Meeting, which is in a couple hours. I suspect that since nobody has said anything, nobody objects. Just want to check. Troy _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
