Not much we can do about pandoc, because it is in RHEL8.
texlive-* packages ... sorry ... scary nightmare after looking at the
spec file for that.
Technically, I believe we could have some type of epel-only texlive-*
package(s) as long as the source rpm isn't the same name as texlive.
But trust me when I say, I won't touch that with a 10 foot pole. I
will run screaming if it's even in the same building as me.
But if others want to try, as long as things don't conflict. I know
there are many texlive-* packages not in RHEL8.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 7:07 AM Leon Fauster <leonfauster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> I am unsure if this is something for RHEL8 or EPEL8:
>
> The usage in EL8 of
>
> pandoc --pdf-engine=xelatex
> pandoc --pdf-engine=lualatex
>
> is broken.
>
> Because EL8 doesn't provide texlive-ucharcat-%{VERSION}.rpm
>
> I already opened a ticket here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820194
>
> Any comments?
>
> Thanks,
> Leon
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
