On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:26 PM James Cassell <fedoraproject@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, at 9:20 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > There does not appear to be an explicit conflict policy for EPEL8: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Does_EPEL_replace_packages_provided_within_Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_or_layered_products.3F > > > > I got a report against python3-s3transfer and python3-botocore > > conflicting with the CentOS 8 HighAvailability repo. No idea if this is > > an issue or not: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821630 > > > > It looks like we have avoided conflicts with the "ha" repos in the past, > > and I can enable the rhel-8-for-x86_64-highavailability-rpms repo on my > > RHEL8 developer license machine so it does seem available to everyone. > > > > It's not available to everyone. It's a paid add-on. My understanding is that EPEL avoids conflicting only with the BaseOS, AppStream, and CodeReady Linux Builder repositories. > > c.f., ansible, which is more widely available than HA, but also carried in EPEL. One addendum to this: EPEL 8 *may* provide conflicting content in non-default module streams (since enabling these is always opt-in). _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
