On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 5:21 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 03:37:29PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 9:52 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > OK so swig3 seems to just be in CentOS extras and not in RHEL extras.
> >
>
> This doesn't make for a good packager experience :)
Well, not sure how to make it better. We could move to building against
CentOS, but that would be a big undertaking and some folks would like
that and some would not.
We could perhaps advertise the developer rhel subscription more for
testing?
Open to other ideas...
Well I should have been more specific. What I mean by a "poort packager experience" is about consistency. When I build the package in mock, it built. When I built it in COPR, it built. But when I tried to build the real package, it failed.
This may be a corner case where things are "different" but consistency *IS* important.
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
