EPEL Issue #101 [1] has pointed out that our current policy for stalled EPEL requests is fairly in-efficient and can cause some long delays. What do people think the process should be? Here is an example: * A packager opens a bugzilla requesting a package be added to EPEL. They also express that they are willing to help maintain / co-maintain that package in EPEL. * A period of time goes by with no response * They re-say that they are willing to maintain / co-maintain the package in EPEL * Another period of time goes by with no response * They file a rel-eng ticket, that points to the bugzilla, requesting appropriate privileges to be able to branch and build that package in EPELX * That happens. * They then request branch, and build the package in EPELX following normal ways. This is just an example, but it's what I picture in my head. Troy [1] - https://pagure.io/epel/issue/101 _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
