On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 5:54 AM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In EPEL 8 or later, it is permitted to have module streams which contain > packages with alternate versions to those provided in RHEL. These packages > may be newer, built with different options, or even older to serve > compatibility needs. These MUST NOT be the default stream -- in every > case, explicit user action must be required to opt in to these versions. Is there any chance that a module in EPEL 8 will be named identically to a module in RHEL 8? If that happens, what is the process to choose between RHEL's module and EPEL's module? This is not entirely hypothetical :) We face this situation if we consider putting Ceph into a module in RHEL 8 and a module in EPEL 8. - Ken _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
