Re: Added arches but no automatic rebuild?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm showing:

# Needed until LibRaw is available on s390x and aarch64
%if 0%{?rhel} >= 8
ExclusiveArch:  x86_64 ppc64le
%endif

Within the SPEC file.

On 2/12/20 9:22 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 9:18 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 09:46, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm sure it was announced but I've been very busy lately but while trying to build a package for EPEL 8 I noticed that two builds (arches) failed for missing dependencies but two did not.

I see that there are a number of arches not originally part of RHEL 8, which is fine, but when the arches were added shouldn't all of the affected packages been rebuilt to add the new arches?


I don't know what you are seeing to say this. The arches which were initially there were x86_64, ppc64le, s390x and aarch64. I don't know of any arches added after that and those have been in el8 since day 1.

My original build of OpenImageIO only has x86_64 and ppc64le which I believe are the two RHEL 8 arches, correct?


I have never used ExcludeArch in OpenImageIO...

Thanks,
Richard 

_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.fedoraproject.org_en-2DUS_project_code-2Dof-2Dconduct_&d=DwIGaQ&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=OAMtP0DWou0nlXG7Kmxo2enjXJfwb1DXS9fwcaESuTE&m=JREsJ1UsNfneo0dfASSv7aXJ636AuoNqrvjWCNarRXM&s=mVV_yErzQEhhxdyMvDbkiv_oViMVis2uo6rwY8LCtuU&e= 
List Guidelines: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__fedoraproject.org_wiki_Mailing-5Flist-5Fguidelines&d=DwIGaQ&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=OAMtP0DWou0nlXG7Kmxo2enjXJfwb1DXS9fwcaESuTE&m=JREsJ1UsNfneo0dfASSv7aXJ636AuoNqrvjWCNarRXM&s=h_lYjzEIEJDX2E6sTA4sdFf81a50cSLYUgzVIhmCV7g&e= 
List Archives: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.fedoraproject.org_archives_list_epel-2Ddevel-40lists.fedoraproject.org&d=DwIGaQ&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=OAMtP0DWou0nlXG7Kmxo2enjXJfwb1DXS9fwcaESuTE&m=JREsJ1UsNfneo0dfASSv7aXJ636AuoNqrvjWCNarRXM&s=g0LPIxaoeIpqaiUcgHeXbgEP_xnRNTSRu1K5mzN3hHE&e= 

-- 
Pat Riehecky

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux