Re: Need to get Steering Committee consensus: packages in old modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 12:37 AM Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 02:35:43PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > My main job is working with Fedora Infrastructure, and we are trying to
> > work out how to handle:
> >
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8558
> >
> > The problem is that various tools filter what packages can be branched into
> > Fedora see that libssh2 was in a module that RHEL shipped in 8.0 but it is
> > no longer in the release with 8.1.
> >
> > Do we need to make libssh2 a module?
> > Should we allow libssh2 be branched as a 'bare' package in EPEL proper?
> > Other?
> >
> RHEL keeps old packages and old modules in repositories. That means even on
> a fresh RHEL 8.1 installation you will get a virt:rhel stream that will
> provide the libssh2 package. The package will come from an older virt:rhel
> module build.
>
> Because DNF prefers modular packages over bare packages, despite that EPEL
> provides libssh2 bare package, the EPEL one will be masked and the modular
> RHEL one preferred.
>
> Because virt:rhel is a default stream, the stream is active by default and
> thus this modular filter applies by default.
>
> Hence adding a bare libssh2 package to EPEL won't help. EPEL needs to
> provide a modular libssh2 package with a higher package NEVRA if the goal is
> to overtake the libssh2 package maintenance from RHEL to EPEL.
>
> So far my humble knowledge of DNF. I believe DNF team knows about this
> limitation and one of their goals for the future is to make a modular package
> obsolescence possible.
>
> -- Petr

So, I just want to bring up something.  The customers assumptions were wrong.
1 - They said that libssh2 was in RHEL 8.0 AppStream, but removed in RHEL 8.1.
Nope, it was never in a non-module in RHEL 8 at all.
2 - They said that libssh2 is not available at all in RHEL 8.1, even
from modules.
Nope.  It totally is.
I just did a fresh install of RHEL 8.1.  This is a minimal install,
but even minimal get's the virt module enabled.
The RHEL 8.1 module has libssh2 in it.

The rumor that libssh2 was in RHEL 8.0 AppStream is false.  The rumor
that it was removed in RHEL 8.1 is false.

BUT ... that doesn't change the problem that people want libssh2 from EPEL.
I think this is a valid request and should be discussed.
I just want the facts to get straightened out.

Troy
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux