On 30. 01. 20 16:52, Pat Riehecky wrote:
On 1/30/20 9:47 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 30. 01. 20 16:44, Pat Riehecky wrote:
While I lack good answers, perhaps another question. What a the thoughts on
using python `.pth` files for python modules that work in multiple interpreters?
In theory this would permit bit for bit identical libraries in multiple
interpreters at once?
Where would you put the files on the filesystem level?
How would we handle different bytecode caches and extension modules?
Perhaps something like /usr/lib/python-epel? I thought python 3.6+ used the
__pycache__ directory that was able to distinguish between the various python
bytecodes.
Yes, but do we always ship all possible versions?
I believe extension modules must be compiled for a specific interpreter... I
could be wrong there... I don't recall ever building one myself.
That is the case, exactly.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
