Re: Removal of mingw-* packages from EPEL 7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 09:36, Troy Dawson <tdawson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:21 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > MinGW is a Windows cross compiler for Fedora.  There is a base
> > toolchain like mingw-filesystem and mingw-gcc, and many cross-compiled
> > libraries like mingw-glib2 which you can link with your programs to
> > make Windows binaries, all without needing to interact with Windows
> > itself.
> >
> > The mingw-* packages are primarily developed in Fedora.  We added them
> > to EPEL 7 a long time ago, but they have been effectively unmaintained
> > for a really long time.  I don't know how to find out exactly when
> > they were branched, but a random sample of packages I looked at
> > haven't been updated in epel7/ since 2014(!), only shortly after RHEL
> > 7 was released.  They therefore remain at very old versions with the
> > attendant problems that brings.
> >
> > Therefore we would like to remove them from EPEL 7.
> >
> > If this is going to cause a problem, then honestly the only way you'll
> > be able to save them is to step up to do the maintenance on them right
> > now.
> >
> > I'm not very clear on the exact removal method, whether that is going
> > to be retirement, orphaning or even blocking them at the RCM level
> > from EPEL, but expect they'll go away unless someone very soon starts
> > to maintain them actively.
> >
> > Note that some of these packages are in RHEL 8 CRB where they are used
> > to build various Windows programs that Red Hat ships, but none of them
> > are branched for EPEL 8 that I'm aware of.
> >
> > More information in this thread:
> >
> > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2333
> >
> > Rich.
>
> Adding to that, a couple of the packages are un-installable from EPEL7.
> It's only two, but on that bugzilla it was suggested that the packages
> be removed.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760979
>
> Judging from the number of CVE's listed in the fesco issue, I suggest
> archival and removal.
> Troy

Agreed



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux