Hi Derek, Maybe if you asked in the bug to be the maintainer of xlockmore for epel8 they would grant that. It's very likely that the owners of the package aren't actively reading epel-devel. On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 9:53 PM Derek Schrock <dereks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Would it be possible for someone to push xlockmore for epel8 [1] thru > such that we can get fvwm out of epel8-testing [2]. > > I'm the reporter of both bugs [1][2]. If needed I can be the maintainer > for xlockmore for epel8. > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758005 > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756673 > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
