On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 2:25 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Now that modules in epel are close to becoming reality [1] it has > brought up a question. > If it's already been asked and answered, please point me to it. > > If we are building a module, and one of the packages in that module > depends on one of the missing RHEL devel packages. > Is it acceptable to build that package in the module, and filter it > out, so that it is only used in the module? > Or, should we continue to wait for the solution to our missing devel > package problem. > > Troy Dawson > > [1] - Many thanks to Merlin and Mohan for their tremendous efforts. Just had another epel/module question come up. Although I think I know the answer, I just want to double check. This is coming from the KDE perspective. RHEL8 has several core qt5 packages. Would it be possible to have those core qt5 packages updated, in a module, and the rest of KDE not in a module, but still build off those newer qt5 packages? My brain says, no. It's either all in a module, or all built off those RHEL8 qt5 packages. Is that correct? Or have I missed something. Troy _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
