On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 5:26 PM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So I started to review > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767883 which is a package > which is normally in the zlib package but has been commented out from > shipping on RHEL-8. It is needed for chromium and other items so Tom > Callaway has made up a package for it. However the naming guidelines > for packages have deprecated -compat packages even though this seems > to have been added after that rule was put in place. > > In reviewing the package the name was the only thing which came up and > i would like to give it a pass versus having it renamed to minizip1.2 > (or better yet libminizip since all it is a library) untl the upstream > zlib package is named that way also. > Honestly, it should probably be fixed in Fedora to be minizip1 / minizip1-devel instead of minizip-compat / minizip-compat-devel... But I guess that as long as it's not that in Fedora, it's fine to be not it in EPEL... -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
