Re: How do we want to handle ruby gems in EPEL8?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I  say put them in the main EPEL 8, without modules.
They get built against the default RHEL8 ruby module.
When RHEL8 get's another ruby module, then we can create and EPEL8
rubygem module that works for that RHEL8 module.
But have all the rubygems in non-module EPEL8, be built against the
default RHEL8 ruby module.

Troy
p.s. The rubygems that are currently in -playground, are from me, for
KDE.  I'm currently in the process of putting them in regular EPEL8.
I'm letting the regular maintainer build them if they wish, or if they
don't want (such as the ones Vic owns) I'm maintaining them for EPEL8.

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 7:19 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Orion,
>
> I myself don't plan to build anything for EPEL8 with possibly
> rubygem-gem2rpm exception. Also, I would suggest against modules.
>
>
> Vít
>
>
>
> Dne 18. 10. 19 v 16:14 Orion Poplawski napsal(a):
> >   Do we have a plan for how we want to handle ruby gems in EPEL8?
> > ruby is a module in RHEL8 so it seems like we would want to do that it
> > a modular way, which also suggests the possibility of a group effort
> > to produce a "EPEL8 rubygems" module.  Or just dump them into the main
> > repo, at least for now.  Or something else?
> >
> >
> > We currently have some ruby packages in epel directly, and some just
> > in playground:
> >
> > ruby-caca                  0.99-0.43.beta19.el8
> > ruby-caca                  0.99-0.43.beta19.epel8.playground
> > rubygem-builder            3.2.3-6.el8
> > rubygem-hpricot            0.8.6-26.epel8.playground
> > rubygem-introspection      0.0.4-6.el8
> > rubygem-metaclass          0.0.4-8.el8
> > rubygem-mustache           1.0.2-8.epel8.playground
> > rubygem-qpid_proton        0.29.0-1.epel8.playground
> > rubygem-rake-compiler      1.0.7-3.epel8.playground.1
> > rubygem-rdiscount          2.2.0.1-5.epel8.playground
> > rubygem-ronn               0.7.3-13.epel8.playground
> >
> > ruby-caca gets built from libcaca - not sure how those kinds of
> > libraries should be handled.
> >
> > Currently I'm holding off building shapelib (and thus plplot) for
> > EPEL8 directly due to its dependency on rubygem-ronn (and its deps)
> > until we sort this out.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux