On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 02:54:26PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > After the announcement today of centos-stream, I wonder if it would make > sense to move epel8-playground to build against that instead of the > latest rhel8 release? This is something we're talking about at the CentOS Stream kickoff meeting. As EPEL exists today against RHEL and CentOS Linux rebuild, there's a lag time problem when there are surprising RHEL updates -- usually fixed in a few days but sometimes weeks. With CentOS Stream, hopefully there will be no surprises, but the gap between CentOS Stream and RHEL will be always there. I think if we changed EPEL Playground to build against CentOS Stream, we'd just move the bifurcation problem rather than solving it. I kind of think we need _both_ epel8 and epel8-playground built against both RHEL and CentOS Stream. But I'd love to hear better ideas. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
