On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 18:03, Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 9/24/19 4:41 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: > > Actually, looking closer, there is not package called "vulkan". > > So, not having 'vulkan-devel' is very logical. > > > > For RHEL8 vulkan synced with F29, which split it's packaging up. In > > vulkan's place is > > > > vulkan-headers > > vulkan-loader > > vulkan-tools > > vulkan-validation-layers > > > > So, look what you would use in Fedora right now, and use the > > appropriate package(s) > > Yes, the 'vulkan' package has seen some interesting package splitting over the years. > > Today, vulkan-devel is a virtual provides by vulkan-loader. The > 'vulkan-loader-devel' package is what I really want, but that package is not > provided in aarch64 either. > > What now? At the moment exclusive arch x86_64 would be it. -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
