On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 5:54 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > After the announcement today of centos-stream, I wonder if it would make > sense to move epel8-playground to build against that instead of the > latest rhel8 release? > > It would make playground less usefull for testing new radical changes > against the current stable point release, but on the other hand, the > centos stream will become the next stable point release, so it would > allow people to test against that and get changes ready that they could > then push in after the next stable point release landed? > > What do folks think? Bad idea, good idea? > If we do that, then we should rename `epel8-playground` to `epel8-stream`... I'd like it to work the same way that epel7 worked. And that means no more automatic provisioning epel8-playground for epel8 stuff. And package.cfg should become optional. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
