On 8/13/19 11:15 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 13. 08. 19 20:08, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On 8/11/19 1:45 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> On 11. 08. 19 9:59, Mohan Boddu wrote: >>>> I unretired the packages and tagged the old builds, I think that >>>> should fix the buildroot and got a testing build working. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, now. >>> >>> Assuming Koji sees RHEL 7.7, can we somehow: >>> >>> - keep the packages in the repos >>> - but make Koji prefer the RHEL ones (they have higher EVR)? >> >> Are they using the same source package name? >> >> If so, the epel one will always be used. >> If not, they should both be available. > > Some, most importantly python-rpm-macros, use the same source package > name and were retired in EPEL, however that broke centos. So they got > unretired, but that broke Koji. > > We could possibly package "python-rpm-macros-temporary" but this has > already drained a lot of my energy, so somebody else needs to do that, > sorry. I think all we need to do is update python-rpm-macros in epel so that they meet the needs of the rhel 7.7 python2: DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides python-rpm-macros > 3-30 needed by python-devel-2.7.5-86.el7.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides python2-rpm-macros > 3-30 needed by python-devel-2.7.5-86.el7.x86_64 What do folks think of: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros/pull-request/28 kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
