On Sat, 10 Aug 2019, Richard Grainger wrote:
On 10 Aug 2019, at 20:23, Miro HronÄok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: While I really tried to do my best, it seems that I broke CentOS by retiring python36. Should it be unretired? Or is it reasonable to say: Please wait for CentOS 7.7?This is why I believe we need a “CentOS-EPEL†repo that mirrors EPEL generally, but that is frozen in the period between a RHEL and CentOS release.
The same could be said for a Scientific-Linux-EPEL. Would it be clearer to have an EPEL7.6 and an EPEL7.7 ? -- Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
