Re: Epel7 Questions: Python34 - 36 transition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:42 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 11. 03. 19 15:54, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 8:16 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/9/19 7:15 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> There are a few questions I have, and since I'm not positive who all
> >>> of the correct people ask are, I'm sending to the epel-devel list.
> >>>
> >>> Before I start the questions, thank you to everyone who helped out in
> >>> getting the build failures working.  Thank you. thank you. thank you.
> >>>
> >>> We have all the python packages rebuilt.  All of the packages needed
> >>> for the rebuilds are tagged into override, and thus in the buildroot.
> >>> None of these rebuilt packages have been put into updates, and thus
> >>> are not in -testing.
> >>>
> >>> Where do we go from here?
> >>> A) Do I do one big update for all of the rebuilt packages?
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >>
> >>> B) Do I do individual updates for each package?
> >>> C) Some combination of above?
> >>
> >> Bad idea, as then some dependent packages could go out stable without
> >> all the packages they need.
> >>
> >>> D) Do a side tag, and take out all the overrides?
> >>
> >> Nope... side tag won't push them out, unless we just merge them into the
> >> main tag, but then they are bypassing testing.
> >>
> >>> I personally think C.  Do the main components (rpm macros, python34
> >>> and python36) in one update.  All the rest get their individual
> >>> update.
> >>
> >> All the other ones are going to need at least python36, so no, they
> >> should all be in one big update. Otherwise some of them could go stable
> >> and not have the python36 yet.
> >>
> >>> How long do we expect to be in this testing stage?
> >>
> >> I'd say at least 2 weeks?
> >>
> >>> If packagers want to update their python package for whatever reason,
> >>> what should they do?
> >>
> >> Build as usual, but ask someone to edit the update and remove the
> >> previous one and add in the new one.
> >>
> >> Thanks for building and coordinating everything!
> >>
> >> kevin
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback.  You too Miro.
> > After reading both of your reasons for doing A), I agree with you both.
> > Unless anyone objects, we'll plan to do option A
>
>
> Here is my build to include: python-distlib-0.2.7-3.el7
>
Added to my list of packages that will be in the update.
Troy
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux