On 3/11/19 7:54 AM, Troy Dawson wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback. You too Miro. > After reading both of your reasons for doing A), I agree with you both. > Unless anyone objects, we'll plan to do option A > > We only have one package left that fails it's rebuild, python-apsw. > I'm hoping someone can figure out the reason for the %checks failling. [1] > If we can get that fixed, I'll be all set to do the mass update later today. > > If we are only going to have these builds in -testing for a couple of > weeks, how about we shoot for April 2. > I'll be unavailable from March 20-April 2. That would give us 3 weeks. > Hopefully by then we would have announcements made letting people know > the change is coming. Sounds good to me. As soon as the update exists and is pushed to testing we should mail epel-announce and possibly fedora-devel announce about it and mention that it will go stable in 3 weeks if nothing serious is found. And perhaps some blog posts or the like also? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
