On 07/16/2018 12:06 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > > notwithstanding my post on the f-devel ML, ... > > Probaby there should some work on communicating the need to > turn down EPEL 6 at 2020 11 30, and with it those python > 2 modules by that time Sure, smooge usually beats the drum on that a year in advance then multiple times leading up to retirement (at least that was the case for rhel5/epel5). > > Smooge, if from the logs you can comb mirroring apart from > installlation pulls, having a ranked list of python(2) > candidates, to point > > > The python 2 in EPEL 7 (I see a mess of them), despite under > 40 or so python 2's in base / update RHEL, it may make sense > to see of one of the automated conversion rubric will work on > say 80 pct of the packages there. Perhaps simply filing bugs > asking the question for each, so we can garner some stats I'm confused here. I doubt very much RHEL is going to drop python2 from rhel7. Thus epe7 packages should be able to go on as they have... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/WJHFPB6S77HG25BVKZ3BV6NZEDTARNAJ/
