On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 04/11/2018 03:13 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >>> It may cause pain to current RHEL ansible users, but I think that the >>> EPEL package needs to be renamed to something like "ansible25" to >>> avoid conflicts with the RHEL channel. >> >> I don't think thats practical / desirable. >> >> kevin > > I'd agree that it would have been easier to do up front. On further > thought, say call it "ansible-rhel" to resemble the way mysql and java > are published as distiinctly named sets of tools for different > published releases from different authors. This really doesn't matter. At the end of it, the Ansible guys are willing support Ansible on EL7 from either source, so it's a moot point. I would be shocked if we wouldn't be keeping it relatively in sync between the two channels anyway, since the reason for Ansible being moved out of Extras is so it can move faster. Leave it as "ansible" and call it good. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
