On 31 January 2018 at 09:57, Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Todd Zullinger <tmz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> I thought aarch64 was also supported for this.
>
> It looks like the devtoolset bits are still in the sclo
> testing repositories for aarch64¹. We could potentially
> enable those in the mock configs if they're ready for more
> testing. Or we can wait for them to reach stable.
Yeah, I wish this was more widely documented, but CentOS' DTS 7 is now
built for ppc64le and aarch64.
So we have a problem with what is the canonical place for SCL's. I was going from http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/ which just says x86_64.
There are parts built in CBS but it isn't clear that these are any more official than a Fedora COPR... I will let someone with releng experience say whether that is ok or not.
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14078
- Ken
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
