[Apologies if this appears twice, but it doesn't seem to have got through.] Brandon Hsu <brandon.hsu-TEftkcFI+2uAmYF/tR2SNU1QfAb4XDUr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi, > > I try to compile and install some programs in CentOS 7 which depends on > LAPACK. > > I hope to use LAPACK linked to OpenBLAS, which gives better performance > compared to Reference BLAS. OpenBLAS provides its own LAPACK, which has some optimizations and is probably more recent than RHEl's -- I haven't checked. You can just link against that, and the EPEL OB rpms are recent. > But in CentOS 7, LAPACK packages is linked to Netlib BLAS, not OpenBLAS. > > As far as I know, in Arch Linux, their team provides such package > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openblas-lapack/ > > which provides LAPACK library linked to OpenBLAS. > > So I guess it is possible to have such package in CentOS, too. > > I know that I can just compile LAPACK + OpenBLAS by myself rather than > installing pre-compiled packages, but it would be better to have rpm files > instead.. The linear algebra situation in RHEl/Fedora is unfortunate, but you can hack around linkage with inefficient BLAS/LAPACK <https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/blas-subversion.html>. _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
