Re: EPEL Wiki Pages to delete

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/08/2017 12:28 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> OK there are a LOT of pages with EPEL information on them which are
> just plain wrong or dead in some way. I would like to get rid of these
> as a first pass so we can look at what is left over afterwords to see
> what would be a good cleanup afterwords.
> 
> Please review these and see if there is any information that should be
> put in a more condensed form elsewhere?
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/LongTerm
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Misc
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/NextTestingStableMove
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/De_DE/EPEL
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/De_DE/EPEL/%C3%9Cber
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Bug_Day_2014
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Marketing
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Package_Wish_List
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Package_Wish_List/ja
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL-meeting-process
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/EPEL_repositoryinfo
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FrontPageStarters
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FrontPageStarters/ja
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/JeffSheltren/EPELMeetingTime
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/OpenIssues
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ReleaseManagers
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Schedule
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Schedule/ja
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/WishList/rt3

Seems fine to remove to me.

> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_QA

The stuff about updates staying in testing for two weeks still seems relevant.
 Not sure if it is anywhere else.

> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatus
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatus/ja
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatusYes
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatusNo

I *think* the ContributorStatusNo was partially useful.  The idea being that
if you want a package in EPEL and the maintainer was on this list you didn't
have to bug them first before putting in a SCM request.  I suppose now you can
simply put in a branch request in pkgdb though, so probably even less useful
currently.


-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                          720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       orion@xxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301                   http://www.nwra.com
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux