On 10/20/2016 01:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:55:02PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: >> Part of my thinking is the situation where CentOS SIGs need EPEL >> packages and (aiui currently) have to import to git.centos.org and build >> the packages on cbs.centos.org. > > Do you mean for 32-bit in specific, or in general? In that case, why > import instead of just using the packages directly? I think it's the same situation that Fedora has -- if it's not built on CentOS infra, then it can't be called "CentOS." For end users we now have the EPEL repo package available, but that doesn't help SIG dependencies. AIUI, YMMV. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade Community Infra & Platform (Mgr) Open Source and Standards, @redhatopen @quaid gpg: AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
