On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:54:44 -0700 Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/15/2016 10:43 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 07:54:25 +0000 (UTC) > > john tatt <zikamev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> HiSo almost one year ago, some people asked for a 32bits EPEL 7 > >> repo, as you can see. In last january, the goal was apparently to > >> bring it just after fixing the ppc64 Do you think it will happen > >> someday ? > > > > I hope so, but it's going to be tricky. There's no RHEL for 32bit, > > so we would need to use CentOS, but then what do we do at the times > > rhel updates and CentOS hasn't yet? Perhaps we build against CentOS > > CI... > > I'll go out for a stretch here and ask ... what if we build not only > against CentOS CI but in the CentOS build system? Well, not sure how that would work. You mean when you do a 'fedpkg build' it builds the normal epel arches in the Fedora koji and also fires off a i686 build in the centos build system? If so: * We would need to issue certs for every epel maintainer to be able to build in centos. * Also the centos build sys would need to allow builds from Fedora pkgs source. * Things could get out of sync if the centos build and epel builds one or the other fails. * How would maintainers push updates in the centos side? Or would that just collect the builds and make a single repo/release ? kevin
Attachment:
pgpwq4fpGmTzN.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
