On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 01:28:42PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 01:13:40PM -0500, David Shea wrote: > > On 02/25/2016 11:46 AM, Garrett LeSage wrote: > > >Is this a *real* requirement in 2016? > > Yes. ppc64le uses a VNC interface with a 800x600 display. Even > > That might go towards different default for Server and Workstation, > though, right? Or are people running PPC-LE as desktops? There's no ppc64le desktop userbase that I know of, but the concern is worth discussion. We're talking about customizing the UX of each variant of Fedora, but how far do we take that? If we make them diverge too far, we can't necessarily reuse the interface components in different ways among the variants. Not saying that's the case here, just a generalization about why it is useful to keep the other use cases in mind. > > ignoring that case, the X1 carbon has 2560x1440 pixel screen which, > > when scaled to adjust for the high dpi, has an effective resolution > > of 1280x720. This caused trouble on screens that expected 768 > > vertical pixels. > > :( That's probably a common enough case for other laptops, too. Likely. And I've been wondering if ARM laptops will take off anymore than they already are. If so, that could likely mean smaller everything...including screens. -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> Manager, Installer Engineering Team Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA | EST5EDT _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
