On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 10:34 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote: > На 16.12.2015 в 04:11, Dennis Gilmore написа: > > > > given http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/23/Live/x86_64/ > > > as an example of how we ship live media it is not a great thing to have to > > > do. I strongly feel that a small piece of additional code in > > > livemedia-creator to correctly name the iso given that there is a > > > --image-name flag is reasonable and will save every person that makes > > > livemedia from having to rewrite basically the same function, or us just > > > writing a wrapper around livemedia- creator to do so. > > Hi Dennis, > FYI if you add this, please make it an option so that existing livemedia-creator > behavior isn't affected (where possible). Just recently QE has developed some > tests which use not only the boot.iso but other bits from the generated tree. Hmm, well that answers one of my questions. ;) What tests are these? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
