> On 02/05/2015 12:36 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: > > Next to impossible? Really? I've find it easy to come up with passwords > > that work. We even report libpwquality's reason for any failures. I tried it today with the images built for anaconda dnf test day [1]. The results are very much different, see below: > 'my name is' (good) (10 chars) weak > 'bacon4eva!' (strong) (10 chars) fair > 'hamncheese.' (strong) (10 chars) fair > 'GoPatriots!' (strong) (11 chars) good > 'hey, you!' (good) (8 chars) weak > '8crayons.' (good) (9 chars) fair > 'latte2015' (good) (9 chars) weak So, 3 of your 7 proposed passwords are not allowed in Anaconda. All of these are also weak (8 characters randomly typed on the keyboard, containing an uppercase letter, a number and a special character): mT5&sofj lk6m*Afh 4muDb^pd s@tYu9vb ... and I assume *everything else* based on this formula, according to my testing. I wonder why is my experience so vastly different from yours? [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2015-02-12_Anaconda_DNF _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
