On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 13:28 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > I'm also concerned about CoC warnings and sanction on test@. This is > the list were users volunteer to be abused by software, as such I > think they're > more tolerant. And yet this misfeature hasn't been well received at > all here, overwhelmingly. I'd expect the reception in the rest of > the community > would be quite a bit less docile. On this topic: no-one was warned or sanctioned for complaining about the change. They were warned and sanctioned for complaining about it in a manner which was *clearly* against the code of conduct. As a mod of test@ I do not want to see it turn into the kind of cesspool devel@ can become; that kind of atmosphere is a significant contributing factor to people not wanting to read or contribute to that list and we really don't want that to happen to test@. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
